NIGERIA STAKEHOLDER-SHIP AND ETHNIC SURVIVAL: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTHERN NIGERIA

Celestine Chinedu Ofodile, Alexander Ifunanya Dike

Abstract


Nigeria is a national project for all which is supposed to be inclusive commitment for ethnic groups that make up the entity. The amalgamation in 1914 and republican constitutions as revised defined the plural nature of federal state which serves to entrench doctrine of equity and sense of belonging. However, sense of ethnic suspicions and lack of commitment to national unity pervade nook and cranny of the nation. This is evident in the ongoing ethnic strives, ethnic militia and arms in Nigeria. Peoples of the south-south and south-east have persistently raised raucous blistering against configuration of the federal system which plunder their sense of stakeholder in the Nigeria project. Against this backdrop, this study examined perception of stakeholder-ship in Nigeria federalism among indigenous peoples of southern Nigeria. This study adopted qualitative survey design using 120 sample size, determined purposively. Data were collected and analyzed qualitatively using unstructured interviews and thematic analysis. Study population consisted of indigenous residents in south-east and south-south Nigeria. At qualitative measure, indigenous peoples expressed distrust in the current federal government, the perception reinforced by subtle exclusion from mainstream federal projects, infrastructure, resource control and military hierarchy. It was consensus in both south-south and south-east that Buhari presidency depleted sense of stakeholder, a shift in ideological appraisal of Nigeria unity. This significantly whittled down commitment to national unity. The study recommended need to neutralize ethnic tension through reconstruction of federal constitution to address main problem of stakeholder-ship.


Keywords


federalism, Nigeria stakeholder-ship, ethnic survival, resource control, evidence. Southern Nigeria.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy: Development discourse and good governance in Africa. Zed Books.

African Union. (2007). African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance.

African Union. (2011, July 13). List of countries which have signed, ratified/acceded to the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance. Retrieved from http://au.int/en/sites/default/files/Charter_on_Democracy_and_Governance.pdf

Amadae, S. M. (2019). Rational choice theory: Political science and economics. Encyclopedia Britannica.

Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., & Wolinsky, A. (1986). The Nash bargaining solution in economic modeling. Rand Journal of Economics, 17(2), 176–188.

Christiano, T. (2004). Is normative rational choice theory self-defeating? Ethics, 115(1), 122–141.

Doornbos, M. (2001). “Good governance”: The rise and decline of a policy metaphor? Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 93–108.

European Commission, External Relations. (2010, October 31). European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Strategy Paper 2011–2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/human_rights/index_en.htm

Gaertner, W. (2009). A primer in social choice theory. Oxford University Press.

Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy. WIDER Working Paper No. 2012/30. United Nations University (UNU), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).

Grindle, M. (2010). Good governance: The inflation of an idea. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP 10-023, Harvard Kennedy School.

Harrison, G. (2005). The World Bank, governance and theories of political action in Africa. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(2), 240–260.

Hooker, J. N. (2013). Moral implications of rational choice theories. In Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2007). Manual on fiscal transparency. Washington, DC: IMF.

Kane, I. (2008). The implementation of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance. African Security Review, 17(4), 43–63.

Malloch Brown, M. (2002). Forward. In UNDP, Human development report 2002: Deepening democracy in a fragmented world (pp. v–vi). UNDP.

Matlosa, K. (2008). The African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance: Declaration vs. policy practice. Policy Brief 53. Centre for Policy Studies, Johannesburg.

Moloney, K. (2009). Public administration and governance: A sector-level analysis of World Bank aid. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 609–627.

Nanda, V. (2006). The “good governance” concept revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 269–283.

NEPAD. (2007). Governance in Africa’s development: Progress, prospects and challenges. Thematic paper prepared by the NEPAD Secretariat for the 9th Africa Partnership Forum, Algiers, Algeria, 12–13 November.

New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2012, January 2). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/africa/osaa/reports/nepadEngversion.pdf

Nwabueze, B. (2018, February 3). Why Nigeria is now qualified as a failed state. Vanguard. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from https://www.vanguardng.com/2018/02/nigeria-now-qualified-fail-state

Nweke, K. (2019). The Nigerian state and Hobbes’ social contract theory: An albatross around the collective will of the people. European Journal of Scientific Research, 152(3).

Oestreich, J. E. (2004). The human rights responsibilities of the World Bank: A business paradigm. Global Social Policy, 4(1), 55–76.

Onanuga, B. (2014). Nigeria’s crisis of governance. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from https://www.pmnewsnigeria.com/2014/03/13/nigerians-crisis-of-goverance

Otubanjo, F. (2018). The citizen and the state: The balance of obligation in Africa. Philosophical Enquiries, 2(11).

Palacio, A. (2006, October). The way forward: Human rights and the World Bank Group. World Bank. Retrieved from http://go.worldbank.org

Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological theory (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Saungweme, S. (2007, May). A critical look at the Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance in Africa. AfriMap paper. Retrieved from http://www.afrimap.org/english/images/paper/ACDEG_Saungweme.pdf

Shihata, I. (1988). The World Bank and human rights: An analysis of the legal issues and the record of achievements. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 17, 39–66.

The Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2019). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, No. 24 A, p. 869.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2002). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2009). Supporting country-led democratic governance assessments: Practice note. UNDP.

United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2003). Public sector management reforms in Africa. Addis Ababa: UNECA.

United Nations. (2012, January 2). Governance. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/governance

Williams, G. (2009). Good governance. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of human geography (pp. 606–614). Elsevier.

World Bank. (1989). Sub-Saharan Africa: From crisis to sustainable growth—A long-term perspective study. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. (2007a, March). Strengthening the World Bank Group engagement on governance and anticorruption? Strategic document. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/comments/governancefeedback/gacpaper03212007.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Celestine Chinedu Ofodile, Alexander Ifunanya Dike

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ISSN (Print):   2695-2319

ISSN (Online): 2695-2327

 

 

   

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.